LEGAL PROTECTION FOR GRABFOOD DRIVERS AGAINST FICTITIOUS ORDERS AS DEFAULT ACTIONS: A CIVIL LAW PERSPECTIVE
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v1i3.149The business world in Indonesia is growing rapidly along with the technology development, especially for the business that uses technology as a medium. One example is Grab application which provides GrabFood feature where all activities are conducted online including the payment method. However, with the financing through cash, there is one consequence of GrabFood transaction resulting in fictitious order which can be described as an act of default. In this research, the authors discuss the legality of GrabFood online transactions in terms of positive law in Indonesia and the regulation of legal protection for Grabfood drivers against fictitious orders in civil law as a harmed party due to default. In this research, the authors use Juridical-Normative Research method that the legal materials obtained are sourced from secondary legal materials, statutory approach and case approach. This research is using a descriptive analytical specification in answering the research problem. Based on the research result, PT. Grab Indonesia does not have repressive legal protection against the occurrence of fictitious orders which can be used as an action to provide legal protection to drivers who receive fictitious orders, and provide full compensation to Grab drivers who receive fictitious orders.
Keywords: Legal Protection Fictitious Order Default
Augustti, Vanda Widyawati Putri. “Tanggung Jawab PT Gojek Indonesia Terhadap Kerugian Yang Diderita Pengemudi Gojek Melalui Fitur Go-Food.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 9, no. 1 (2018).
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta, 2007.
Marbun, Rocky. Kamus Hukum Lengkap, Mencangkup Istilah Hukum Dan Perundang-Undangan Terbaru. Jakarta: Visi Media, 2012.
Muchtar, Henni. “ANALISIS YURIDIS NORMATIF SINKRONISASI PERATURAN DAERAH DENGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA.” neliti 14, no. 1 (2015).
Putra, Rendi Febria, Kismartini Kismartini, and Retno Sunu Astuti. “The Effectiveness of Minang Mart Partnership Pattern in Empowering Local Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in West Sumatra.” Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal 12, no. 1 (June 5, 2022): 66–78. http://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/adminpublik/article/view/6269.
Ratna Sari, Putu Dina Marta, and I Made Dedy Priyanto. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KEPADA KONSUMEN TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN KLAUSULA BAKU YANG TERCATUM PADA TOKO ONLINE.” Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 1 (January 17, 2019): 1. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/45887.
Santara, Radhy Alfian. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ASURANSI BAGI PENUMPANG BUS ANTAR KOTA DALAM PROVINSI (AKDP) YANG TIDAK LAIK JALAN BERDASARKAN HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA (STUDI PADA BUS AKDP TRAYEK BANDUNG-BOGOR).” Universitas Pasundan, 2017.
Simamora, Janpatar. “Tafsir Makna Negara Hukum Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 14, no. 3 (2014).
Suhariyanto. Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi. Depok: Rajawali Press, 2012.
