LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR CORPORATE AND GOVERNMENT PARADIGM TO DISASTER VICTIMS
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v2i1.228The environmental law enforcement paradigm has not implimented well. This can be known through the government's inability to stop several acts of environmental destruction committed by several corporations. On the other hand, based on the principles of environmental law, it is stated that the government must be responsible for environmental management. The topic of this research is important to uncover the background between whether or not there were violations of regulations committed by corporations. The results of the research indicated that the paradigm of enforcing environmental law is contained in Law No. 32/2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management; Law No. 24/2007 concerning Disaster Protection; Law No. 30/1999 concerning AAPS (Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution) and Law No. 4/2009 concerning Mining is still a normative paradigm which causes the weakening of environmental law enforcement.
Keywords: Disaster Victims Legal Framework Government Paradigm
Alatas, Zubaidah. “Konsekuensi Kecelakaan Reaktor Chernobyl Terhadap Kesehatan Dan Lingkungan.” IPTEK Ilmiah Populer 7, no. 3 (2006): 79–87. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/241655-konsekuensi-kecelakaan-reaktor-chernobyl-2f32371b.pdf.
Dianty, Jesicha Irma, Ollij Aneke Kereh, and Marthin Lambonan. “Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah Dalam Menyediakan Dana Penanggulangan Bencana Alam Menurut Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2007.” e-journal Unsrat (2022). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/download/42560/37554.
Faridah, Idah, and Kunarso. “The Judge Considerations in Making Decision Against Narcotics in Children.” YURIS (Journal of Court and Justice) 1, no. 4 (2022): 22–33. https://journal.jfpublisher.com/index.php/jcj/article/view/208.
Kuhn, Thomas S. “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.” In Foundations of The Unity of Science, edited by Otto Neurath, 2:222. 2nd ed. United States of America: The University of Chicago Press, 1970. https://www.lri.fr/~mbl/Stanford/CS477/papers/Kuhn-SSR-2ndEd.pdf.
Mamangkey, Ronald. “Ketentuan Pidana Terhadap Korporasi Akibat Melakukan Tindak Pidana Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penanggulangan Bencana.” Lex Crimen 8, no. 12 (2019): 13–19. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/download/27586/27105.
Miswardi, Miswardi. “Kajian Ekonomis Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui ADR (Alternative Despute Resolution).” EKONOMIKA SYARIAH : Journal of Economic Studies 4, no. 1 (July 10, 2020): 74. https://ejournal.uinbukittinggi.ac.id/index.php/febi/article/view/3281.
Patton, Michael Quinn. Alternative Evaluation Research Paradigm. Grand Forks: University of North Dakota Publisher, 1975.
Prasetijo Rijadi dan Sri Priyati. Pengantar Hukum Lingkungan Hidup. Sidoarjo: Al Maktabah, 2020.
Pusat, Pemerintah. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Jakarta, 1997.
———. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Jakarta, 2009. https://jdih.esdm.go.id/storage/document/UU 32 Tahun 2009 (PPLH).pdf.
———. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara. Jakarta, 2009. https://www.bpkp.go.id/public/upload/uu/2/26/04-09.pdf.
Supramono, Gatot. Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup Di Indonesia. 1st ed. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2013.
