CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF NOTARY IN CRIMINAL ACT COMMITTED BY NOTARY SIGNING AGENT
Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v2i1.258This research aims to analyze and examine how the responsibility of a notary in the case of a notary's signing agents commits the crime of document forgery. Article 1 paragraph (1) of Notary Office Law states that a Notary is a Public Official authorized to do authentic deeds and has other authorities as referred to in this Law or based on other laws. The notaries get authority attribution from the state through the Law on Notary Positions. This authority is attached to the position of a notary. In conducting these duties and positions, a Notary is generally assisted by Notary signing agents. In this research, Normative Law is used because it tries to find the location of coherence, namely legal rules and legal norms. Notary workers are only assistants in their work, and the responsibility for authentic deeds remains to the Notary. When the Notary signing agents commit document forgery, resulting in defects in the authentic deed, it is possible that Notary must hold responsible for this. The forgery of letters can occur due to fake contents of the letter or fake authority and contents of authority in the letter. The forms of Notary Criminal Liability, if it is proven that the notary worker committed the crime of forging letters, is a crime of participation in the crime of forging letters because the Notary is considered negligent in conducting his duties and position.
Keywords: Criminal Liability, Forgery of Letters Notary Notary Signing Agents
ADCO Law. “Legal Research Methods in Legal Problem Solving.” ADCO Law. Last modified 2022. https://adcolaw.com/blog/legal-research-methods-in-legal-problem-solving/.
Adjie, Habib. Hukum Kenotariatan Indonesia Tafsiran Tematik Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Bandung: Cetakan Ketiga. Refikaditama. Catakan ke. Bandung: Refikaditama, 2011.
Ayu Khairina, Mayrsha. “Pertanggung Jawaban Hukum Bagi Notaris Atas Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Karyawan Notaris.” Jurnal Officium Notarium 1, no. 1 (April 2021).
Dwidja Priyatno. Kebijakan Legislasi Tentang Sistem Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Di Indonesia. 1st ed. Bandung Utomo, 2009.
Erwin, Muhammad, and Amrullah Arpan. Filsafat Hukum: Mencari Hakikat Hukum. Edisi Revi. Palembang: Universitas Sriwijaya, 2008.
Fakhiryah, Vany Nur. “Tindak Pidana Memasukkan Keterangan Palsu Ke Dalam Akta Otentik Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia (Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 602 K/PID/2016).” Jurnal Hukum Media Justitia Nusantara 10, no. 2 (2020): 35–56.
Fidelia, Tyas. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Ketidaksesuaian Akta Salinan Dengan Minuta Akta.” Kosmik Hukum 20, no. 1 (August 19, 2020): 35. http://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/KOSMIK/article/view/5410.
Hermawati, Risa. “Pemalsuan Akta Autentik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1003 K/Pid/2015).” Otentik’s : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 2, no. 2 (2020): 160–177.
Kaligis, Geovan Valentino. “Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Menurut Pasal 263 KUHP.” Lex Privatum IX IX, no. 4 (2021): 175–182.
Lubis, Adi Utama Pandapotan. “Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Pemalsuan Tanda Tangan Oleh Penghadap Dalam Akta Autentik.” Jurnal SOMASI (Sosial Humaniora Komunikasi) 1, no. 1 (July 2020): 116–128.
Marchelina Rante, and Hernita Matana. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris Terhadap Indikasi Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Yang Dibuat.” Paulus Law Journal 3, no. 1 (December 2021): 29–38.
Subiyantana, Subiyantana, and Nynda Fatmawati Octarina. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Notaris Yang Membuat Keterangan Palsu Dalam Akta Otentik.” JURNAL RECHTENS 9, no. 2 (December 2020): 93–106.
Tedjosaputro, Liliana. Malpraktek Notaris Dan Hukum Pidana. Semarang: Agung, 1991.
Windi. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Yang Akta Otentiknya Berindikasi Sebagai Alat Pencucian Uang.” DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 2 (May 2018): 395.
