REIMAGINING THE DIGITAL ORACLE: AN AFRICAN PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Lagos State University of Education Nigeria
Lagos State University of Education Nigeria
OSHAssociation UK, Superior University Pakistan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6567-5963
Beaconhouse Head Office Pakistan
Universitas Brawijaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jssh.v4i4.869The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) as a source of insight invites its characterization as a "digital oracle," a metaphor with particular resonance in Africa where traditions of divination are deeply embedded. This analogy, however, raises critical questions regarding the understanding, legitimacy, and governance of such systems. This paper employs a multidisciplinary approach, integrating contemporary AI ethics with African philosophy and religious perspectives, to analyze this metaphor. Using the prophetic figure central to Yoruba Ifá divination as a comparative framework, we contrast the communal, symbolically interpreted guidance of traditional oracles (Bascom, 1969) with AI's data-driven predictions, which often lack moral authority and community accountability. In response, we propose that the Ubuntu philosophy, grounded in relational humanity and moral duty, provides a vital corrective. The analysis is structured around four lenses: (1) epistemic opacity and interpretive authority; (2) relational personhood and communal responsibility; (3) spiritual and moral discernment; and (4) decolonial governance. We argue that AI should not be considered an autonomous philosophical oracle but can serve as a valuable decision-support tool when consciously embedded within robust systems of ethics, interpretation, and community. The paper concludes by advocating for AI development guided by Ubuntu ethics, the inclusion of religious thought, and formal decolonial governance. This approach seeks to transform AI into a context-aware tool that serves humanity, rather than an unaccountable digital predictor.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence African Philosophy Decolonial Governance Technology Ethics Ubuntu Ethics
Abimbọla, ’Wande. (1997). Ifá : an exposition of Ifá literary corpus. Athelia Henrietta Press.
African Union. (2024). Continental Artificial Intelligence Strategy. African Union Commision.
Akbar, G. G., Kania, I., Uhmudin, A., Fadlurohman, M. I., & Nurliawati, N. (2025). STAKEHOLDER PERCEPTIONS OF AI USE IN EDUCATION. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.56943/jssh.v4i2.742
Armstrong, S., Sandberg, A., & Bostrom, N. (2012). Thinking Inside the Box: Controlling and Using an Oracle AI. Minds and Machines, 22(4), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-012-9282-2
Awasthi, Y., & Achar, G. O. (2025). African Christian Theology in the Age of AI: Machine Intelligence and Theology in Africa. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 13(1), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.35629/9467-1301207216
Bascom, W. W. (1969). Ifa Divination : Communication between Gods and Men in West Africa. Indiana University Press.
By, D. L., & Ros, D. P. (2024). THE CORRELATIONAL STUDY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION ON STUDENTS’ OUTCOMES. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.56943/jssh.v3i4.615
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Sixth). SAGE Publication, Inc.
Deezia, B. S., & Kilani, A. O. (2023). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE IMPLICATION FOR A ZIIBALOGZII’S WORLDVIEW: THE CONTENTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES. JOS JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY, 4(2). https://acjol.org/index.php/jjrp/article/view/4671
Francis, O. A., & Olojo-Kosoko, K. K. (2024). IFA DIVINATION SYSTEM: AN ARTISTIC EXPRESSION OF YORUBA KNOWLEDGE CREATION. Current Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (CJHASS), 11(6), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.14244030
Furidha, B. W. (2024). COMPREHENSION OF THE DESCRIPTIVE QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHOD: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE LITERATURE. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.56943/jmr.v2i4.443
Goralski, M. A., & Tan, T. K. (2020). Artificial intelligence and sustainable development. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100330
Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Mahapatra, A., Singal, A., Goel, D., Huang, K., Scardapane, S., Spinelli, I., Mahmud, M., & Hussain, A. (2024). Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Cognitive Computation, 16(1), 45–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-023-10179-8
Kaiser, B., Wu, T., Sonnewald, M., Thackray, C., & Callis, S. (2024). A Moonshot for AI Oracles in the Sciences. http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17836
Norren, D. Van. (2022). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence through the Lens of Ubuntu. Montreal AI Ethics Institute. https://montrealethics.ai/the-ethics-of-artificial-intelligence-through-the-lens-of-ubuntu/
Odero, B., Nderitu, D., & Samuel, G. (2024). The Ubuntu Way: Ensuring Ethical AI Integration in Health Research. Wellcome Open Research, 9, 625. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23021.1
Ogude, J. (2018). Ubuntu and personhood. Africa World Press.
Owoyemi, A., Owoyemi, J., Osiyemi, A., & Boyd, A. (2020). Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare in Africa. Frontiers in Digital Health, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2020.00006
Oyasor, E. I. (2024). The Emergence of AI and ChatGPT: Implication for Religion Sustainability in Africa. International Journal of Social Science and Religion (IJSSR), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.53639/ijssr.v5i3.283
Priyati, S., Sudarsono, G. P., Sumartini, S., Permana, D. B., & Swastika, P. A. E. (2024). LEGAL LIABILITY FOR THE CRIME OF DATA THEFT IN FAKE JOB POSTINGS. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.56943/jmr.v3i2.643
Sabherwal, R., & Grover, V. (2024). The Societal Impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Balanced Perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 25(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00860
UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
UNSECO. (2024, September 26). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence
Varshney, K. R. (2024). Decolonial AI Alignment: Openness, Viśed{s}a-Dharma, and Including Excluded Knowledges. http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05030
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Yilma, K. (2025). Ethics of AI in Africa: Interrogating the role of Ubuntu and AI governance initiatives. Ethics and Information Technology, 27(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-025-09834-5
