THE CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR PORNOGRAPHY VIDEO MAKER THROUGH DIGITAL FORENSICS ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v1i2.119Cybercrime phenomenon is a crime that is not easy to trace its existence. Digital Forensics is an application in the Computer Science and Technology for the purpose of pro-justice, which in this case is to prove scientifically high-tech crimes so that digital evidence is obtained and it can be used to catch pornography suspects, which was transmitted to various media, such as magazines, television programs, and internet. Cyberporn is a crime in transmitting some pornography contents through website. This research used juridical- normative method as its research method. The researcher used the method to find out the criminal responsibility for pornography video maker through digital forensics on social media. In consequence, if there is a punishment for the perpetrator, then it is retaliation for his actions which aims to improve attitudes and behavior so that they are even better in using social media services and are also intended to prevent others from the possibility of committing similar acts.
Keywords: Cybercrime Cyberporn Digital Forensics Pornography
Al-Azhar, M. N. Digital Forensic: Panduan Praktis Investigasi Komputer. Jakarta: Salemba Forensik, 2012.
Al-Ghifari, A. Gelombang Kejahatan Seks Remaja. Bandung: Mujahid, 2002.
Christiani, Theresia Anita. “Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 219 (May 2016): 201–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006.
Djamali, R. A. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2010.
Firrar, Utdirartmo. Cara Mudah Menguasai Komputer Forensik Dan Aplikasinya. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2005.
Friedman, L. M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Publications of Russell Sage Foundation. Russell Sage Foundation, 1975. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=DKJ654VkMb8C.
Friedman, Lawrence. “On Legal Development.” 24 Rutgers Law Review 11 (1969).
Huda, C. Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggung-Jawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008.
Lamintang, P. A. F., and F. T. Lamintang. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika, 2022. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=_CRtEAAAQBAJ.
Lubis, Rahmi, Zahrotur Rusyda Hinduan, Ratna Jatnika, and Hendriati Agustiani. “INTENSI SEKSUAL REMAJA: APA SAJA FAKTOR PEMBEDANYA?” Journal of Psychological Science and Profession 5, no. 3 (December 30, 2021): 177. https://doi.org/10.24198/jpsp.v5i3.32773.
Mertokusumo. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2006.
Muladi. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Badan Penerbit, Universitas Diponegoro, 1995. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=eSmcAAAACAAJ.
Priyatno, Dwidja. Kebijakan Legislasi Tentang Sistem Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Di IndonesiaUtomo,. Bandung: Bandung Utomo, 2009.
Raharjo, Budi. “SEKILAS MENGENAI FORENSIK DIGITAL.” Jurnal Sosioteknologi 12, no. 29 (August 2013): 384–87. https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2013.12.29.3.
Reksodiputro, Mardjono. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Melihat Kepada Kejahatan Dan Penegak Hukum Dalam Batas-Batas Toleransi. Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 1993.
Saleh, R. Perbuatan Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1990.
Sofyan, Andi. Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar. Prenada Media, 2017. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=hEaaDwAAQBAJ.
Subekti, R. Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2001.
