POLITICS OF CRIMINAL LAW LIABILITY OF CORPORATE CRIMINAL IN INDONESIA
Universitas Islam Malang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v1i1.12This research paper examines the urgent need to reform the Indonesian Criminal Code to recognize corporations as subjects of criminal law. It delves into the concept of corporate criminal liability, highlighting the importance of establishing clear legal frameworks to hold corporations accountable for their actions. The study analyzes the politics of criminal law in Indonesia, focusing on shaping legal policies to address societal needs and ensure justice. Key findings include the necessity of incorporating various theories of corporate punishment (such as strict liability, vicarious liability, identification theory, and aggregation theory) into the legal framework to effectively address corporate criminal behavior. The research also reviews the RKUHP (Revised Criminal Code Bill), which explicitly defines corporate criminal liability and outlines the responsibilities of corporate management in crimes committed on behalf of corporations. Using normative juridical research methods, including statute and conceptual approaches, the paper examines existing legal regulations and their implications for corporate accountability in Indonesia. Concluding that a comprehensive understanding of corporate criminal liability is vital for law enforcement and judicial authorities to enforce the law effectively, the study advocates for legal reforms aligned with the values of Pancasila, reflecting Indonesia's unique socio-cultural context while addressing the complexities of corporate crime.
Keywords: Corporation Penal Policy Responsibility
Alfikri, Erdianto, and Erdiansyah. “Politik Hukum Pidana Pertanggungjawabanpidana Korporasi Dikaitkan Sebagai Subjek Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Online Mahasiswa 5, no. 2 (2018). https://jnse.ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFHUKUM/article/view/22364.
Arief, B. N. Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1998. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=OpVkAAAACAAJ.
Mahmud, Muhammad Isra. “Peran Vicarious Liability Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi (Studi Terhadap Kejahatan Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Kader Partai Politik).” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 5, no. 4 (October 1, 2020). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss4.art1.
Muladi, and B. N. Arief. Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Pidana. Alumni, 1984. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=d6t1GwAACAAJ.
Muladi, and Dwidja Priyatno. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi: Edisi Ketiga. Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2002. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=repADwAAQBAJ.
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum: Dipandang Dari Sudut Hukum Perdata. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju, 2018.
Satria, Hariman. “Politik Hukum Tindak Pidana Politik Uang Dalam Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia.” INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi 5, no. 1 (2019): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.342.
Shafrudin, Shafrudin. “Pelaksanaan Politik Hukum Pidana Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia 27, no. 2 (2009).
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Ajaran Pemidanaan: Tindak Pidana Korporasi Dan Seluk Beluknya. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Sudarto. Hukum Dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT Alumni, 2007.
Suratman, and Philips Dillah. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta, 2015.