AN INDONESIA-FRANCE COMPARISON: THE DESIGN MECHANISM FOR LEGISLATION ESTABLISHMENT AND LEGISLATION REGULATION EVALUATION
Lecturer Faculty of Law Universitas Terbuka
Lecturer Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)
Lecturer Faculty of Syariah UIN Fatmawati Soekarno Bengkulu
Research Center for Law National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v1i2.132The good laws and regulations are in harmony with other laws and regulations. The disharmony of a statutory regulation with other regulations, both at the same level and at different levels, will cause a complex problem. As a result, these regulations can be canceled due to things that are contrary to constitution, laws and other regulations. This research is a qualitative research. The research method used is a combination of normative research supported by empirical field research data, namely research that uses information from research targets or subjects who are usually called informants or respondents through data collection instruments such as interviews and then combines it with data from library materials, especially those related to legal issues. Indonesia based on Law No. 12 of 2011 in conjunction with Law 15 of 2019 has determined a review system and monitoring in law formation, but the best practice from French regarding legislation reviews by independent institutions, called constitutional council and evaluation methods that implement by Australian with the sunset regulation and rescheduling culled methods provides a new perspective on the formation and evaluation in Indonesia, there will be consequences in adopting it either partially or completely that will be discussed in further research.
Keywords: Legislation Establishment Legislation Evaluation Laws Formation
Ahmad, Sharique, Saeeda Wasim, Sumaiya Irfan, Sudarshana Gogoi, Anshika Srivastava, and Zarina Farheen. “Qualitative v/s. Quantitative Research- A Summarized Review.” Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare 6, no. 43 (October 28, 2019): 2828–32. https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2019/587.
Ali, Faried. Hukum Tata Pemerintahan Dan Proses Legislatif Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996.
Armia, Muhammad, Ar-Raniry Jl, Abdul Syeikh, Kopelma Rauf, Banda Darussalam, and Aceh. “CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW: LESSON LEARNED FOR INDONESIA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DAN PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG: PEMBELAJARAN BAGI INDONESIA,” 2017.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Hak Menguji (Toetsingsrecht) Yang Dimiliki Hakim Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.
Barendt, E M. An Introduction to Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press, 2023. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=BQ1I0AEACAAJ.
Mamudji, Sri, and Soerjono Soekanto. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=_Y1GPAAACAAJ.
Marzuki, Peter. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media, 2017. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=CKZADwAAQBAJ.
Nugroho, Bimo Satria Fajrin, and Muhamad Adji Rahardian Utama. “Legal Protection of Copyright in the Globalization Era: A Comparison of Indonesia and China.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 1, no. 4 (July 31, 2020). https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v1i4.39424.
Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning, Ahmad Redi, and Shella Felicia. “The Review of Regulations Through Ministry of Law and Human Rights.” In Proceedings of the Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution International Conference (ADRIC 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200917.015.
Sitompul, Sofyan. “Hak Uji Materiil (Menurut Amandeman UUD 1945 Dan Perbandingan MA Di Amerika Serikat).” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 1, no. 3 (2018): 7–14. https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/download/276/163.
