LEGAL ANALYSIS OF WITNESS TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU’S POSITION ON DECISION NO. 115/PID.SUS/2021/PN.KTG Case Study on Constitutional Court Decision No. 65/PUU-Vlll/2010
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v2i2.357Testmonium de audito has not been accepted as evidence under the Criminal Procedure Code because its authenticity has not been tested. Under the Constitutional Court’s decision No.65/PUU-VIII/2010, testimonium de audito is considered as evidence, and can be used in both criminal and civil cases. Therefore, this research is conducted to determine the witness's position in the trial and verdict Number 115/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Ktg. The case study of Kotamobagu District Court Decision Number 115/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Ktg and Law No. 8/1981 on the Criminal Procedure Code become the basis of normative legal research methodology in this research, which also used primary and secondary sources. The findings of this research indicate that in Constitutional Court Decision No.65/PUU-VIII/2010, law enforcers should agree that witnesses who actually see, hear, or suffer a criminal event are not always required. On the other hand, Testimonium de Auditu witnesses cannot be used as independent witnesses in the case of Decision No. 115/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Ktg because it does not include the requirements of the witnesses required.
Keywords: Court Decision Testimonium De Auditu Witness
Damanik, Yanels Garsione. “Keterangan Saksi Testimonium de Auditu Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia.” Brawijaya Law Student Journal (2015).
Fuady, Munir. Teori Hukum Pembuktian Pidana Dan Perdata. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bhakti, 2020.
Fuady, Munir Dr. Metode Riset Hukum : Pendekatan Teori Dan Konsep. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
Hanifah, Mardalena. “Kajian Yuridis : Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER 2, no. 1 (2016): 1–13. https://jhaper.org/index.php/JHAPER/article/view/21/28.
Hendriawan, Muhammad Rizaldi. “Politics of Criminal Law Liability of Corporate Criminal in Indonesia.” YURIS (Journal of Court and Justice) 1, no. 1 (2022).
Hiariej, Eddy O.S., and Yayat Sri Hayati. Teori Dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.
Kadir, Abdul. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bhakti, 2015.
Muhammad, Rusli. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2019.
Putri, Filzah Arina, and Ahmad Mahyani. “Keterangan Testimonium de Auditu Yang Dijadikan Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Hakim.” Jurnal Untag Surabaya (2023).
Tim Redaksi BIP. 3 Kitab Undang-Undang : KUHPer Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, KUHP Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, KUHAP Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Beserta Penjelasannya. Edited by Saptono Rahardjo. Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Populer, 2017.
Udayana, Fakultas Hukum Universitas. Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana. Bali: Universitas Udayana, 2016. https://simdos.unud.ac.id/uploads/file_pendidikan_1_dir/424c6f6b9a703073876706bc9793eeda.pdf.
Wangke, Asprianti. “Kedudukan Saksi De Auidtu Dalam Praktik Peradilan Menurut Hukum Acara Pidana.” Lex Crimen 6, no. 6 (2017): 146–154.
