POLICY CONSIDERATIONS IN PROVIDING PERFORMANCE ALLOWANCES FOR THE PROCESS OF EXAMINING DISCIPLINARY VIOLATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL OFFICIALS WITHIN THE MINISTRY OF LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN VIEW OF DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj/v3i3.632Performance allowances are one of the incentives often used in public administration to encourage employee performance. However, in the context of examining disciplinary violations against structural officials, careful policy considerations are necessary in order not only to focus on punishment, but also to encourage behavioral improvement. This research adopts the normative juridical method, which refers to regulations on Civil Servant discipline and provisions regarding the provision of performance allowances within the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, as well as other supporting regulations. This analysis aims to examine the considerations of direct superiors in granting performance allowances and the underlying distributive justice mechanism. The research highlights the critical role of direct supervisors in deciding performance allowances for structural officials involved in disciplinary violations. Key considerations include the severity of the violation, corrective actions taken, and the impact on the organization. Decisions should be evidence-based, fair, and aligned with effective personnel management principles, maintaining distributive justice to avoid discrimination or favoritism. Performance allowances should be granted based on objective criteria, such as actual performance and contributions to the organization, to uphold employee trust and morale. Transparent and measurable policies, along with clear communication between supervisors and officials, are essential for fair and sustainable management of performance allowances in the context of disciplinary reviews.
Keywords: Disciplinary Violations Performance Allowances Structural Officials
Creary, Melissa S. “Bounded Justice and the Limits of Health Equity.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 49, no. 2 (June 29, 2021): 241–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2021.34.
Dewi, Femmy Rismala, Andre Ariesmansyah, R. Hari Busthomi Ariffin, and Regan Vaughan. “Implementation E-Government in Employment Management Information System in the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights West Java, Indonesia.” International Journal of Social Science (IJSS) 1, no. 5 (2022): 533–40. https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v1i5.1290.
Gutterman, Alan. Organizational Structure, 2023.
Herawaty, Herawaty. “Good Governance and Strengthening the Management of Civil Servant Towards to World Class Bureaucracy.” Papua Law Journal 2, no. 1 (October 25, 2018): 40–51. https://doi.org/10.31957/plj.v2i1.596.
Indonesia, Pemerintah Pusat. “Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 94 Tahun 2021 Tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil.” Jakarta, 2021. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/177031/pp-no-94-tahun-2021.
———. “Peraturan Presiden (Perpres) Nomor 130 Tahun 2017 Tentang Tunjangan Kinerja Pegawai Di Lingkungan Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia,” 2017. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/73519/perpres-no-130-tahun-2017.
Iryani, Harry Yulianto, and Lili Nurpadilah. “Pengaruh Tunjangan Kinerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Melalui Kepuasan Kinerja Sebagai Variabel Mediasi.” SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business 5, no. 1 (2022): 343–54. https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v5i1.1651.
Malikhah, Ikhah. “An Effect of Planning, Organizing, Staffing, Leading and Controlling of Operational Leadership.” Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) 4, no. 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i3.2247.
Prabowo, Eko Ady, Muhlis Hafel, Agus Joko Purwanto, and Anfas Anfas. “The Implementation of Providing Performance Allowance Policy in the Secretariat of the General Election Commission Kota Ternate, Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik 9, no. 2 (February 4, 2020): 137. https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v9i2.11529.
Sugandi, and Yogi Suprayogi. “Varieties of Civil Servants Remuneration Policy Reform: A Scenario Planning Analysis.” BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi 24, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v24i1.9477.
Triwulandari, Endah, and Edy Tarsono. “Socio-Juridic Analysis of Abortion According to Article 75 of Law Number 36/2009 Concerning on Health and Law Number 35/2014 Concerning on Child Protection.” IUS POSITUM (Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement) 1, no. 2 (2022): 43–59. https://journal.jfpublisher.com/index.php/jlte/article/view/68.
