PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLES IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY-BASED JOINT FUNDING SERVICES
Universitas Airlangga Surabaya
Universitas Airlangga Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v2i1.273Easy requirements with a fast process and no collateral required make funding through LPBBTI highly popular among the community. In addition, these activities also provide convenience, speed, and practicality in funding. Unfortunately, there are funding risks involved, such as potential defaults by fund recipients. The funding risk will be borne by the funder and the risk will be even greater if there is no collateral in the funding because the position of the funder is only as a concurrent creditor. The objective of this research is to find out precautionary principles in information technology-based joint funding services. The method used judicial normative research was conducted to understand the legal subject and legal relationship of precautionary principles in information technology-based joint funding services. Therefore, the POJK10/POJK.05/2022 does not explicitly state the precautionary principle as the basis for LPBBTI's business activities. However, it has been realized in the norms contained in POJK10/POJK.05/2022, in the form of norms that require and norms that prohibit. One of them is the obligation to conduct funding risk analysis as a risk mitigation effort. This is intended to ensure that LPBBTI develops optimally, healthily, contributively and that users' needs for optimal protection can be accommodated.
Keywords: Funding Risks Precautionary Principles Users
Chandra, Jeffri Arlinandes, Ade Kosasih, Rofi Wahanisa, and Vera Bararah Barid. “An Indonesia-France Comparison: The Design Mechanism for Legislation Establishment and Legislation Regulation Evaluation.” YURIS (Journal of Court and Justice) 1, no. 2 (2022).
Corbisiero, Giuseppe. “Bank Lending, Collateral, and Credit Traps in a Monetary Union.” European Economic Review (2022).
Darman. “Financial Technology (FinTech): Karakteristik Dan Kualitas Pinjaman Pada Peer to Peer Lending Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi 18, no. 2 (2019): 130–137.
Dewan Komisioner Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Salinan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 10/POJK.05/2022 Tentang Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. Jakarta, 2022. https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Documents/Pages/Layanan-Pendanaan-Bersama-Berbasis-Teknologi-Informasi/POJK 10 - 05 - 2022.pdf.
Fais, Kalsum. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pengguna Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi.” Al’Adl Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 1 (2021): 70–90. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/362955-none-6e07ad2e.pdf.
HS, Salim. Hukum Kontrak : Perjanjian, Pinjaman Dan Hibah. Cetakan 1. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.
Langenbucher, Katja, and Patrick Corcoran. “Responsible AI Credit Scoring – A Lesson from Upstart.Com.” In Digital Finance in Europe: Law, Regulation, and Governance. De Gruyter, 2022.
Mulyati, Etty, and Fajrina Aprilianti Dwiputri. “Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Dalam Menganalisis Jaminan Kebendaan Sebagai Pengaman Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan.” ACTA DIURNAL: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan 1, no. 2 (2018).
Njatrijani, Rinitami. “Perkembangan Regulasi Dan Pengawasan Financial Technology Di Indonesia.” DPLR: Diponegoro Private Law Review 4, no. 1 (2019): 462–474.
Suryono, Ryan Randy, Betty Purwandari, and Indra Budi. “Peer to Peer (P2P) Lending Problems and Potential Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review.” In Procedia Computer Science, 204–214. Surabaya, 2019.
Sutherland, Andrew G. “Technology Is Changing Lending: Implications for Research.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 70, no. 2–3 (2020).
Syirfana, Ramdaniar Eka, and Neneng Nurhasanah. “Analisis Fikih Muamalah Terhadap Pemikiran M. Dawam Rahardjo Mengenai Bunga Bank.” Jurnal Riset Ekonomi Syariah (JRES) 1, no. 1 (2021).
Usanti, Trisadini Prasastinah, and Anindya Prastiwi Setiawati. “The Cooperation Between Conventional Commercial Banks and Rural Banks for Financial Inclusiveness Improvement of Small, Medium And Micro Enterprises.” IUS POSITUM (Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement) 1, no. 2 (2022). https://journal.jfpublisher.com/index.php/jlte/article/view/67.
Usanti, Trisadini Prasastinah, Fiska Silvia, and Anindya Prastiwi Setiawati. “Dispute Settlement Method for Lending in Supply Chain Financial Technology in Indonesia.” International Journal of Supply Chain Management 9, no. 3 (2020): 435–443.
Usanti, Trisadini Prasastinah, and Prawitra Thalib. “Asas Ikhtiyati Pada Akad Pembiayaan Mudharabah Di Lingkungan Perbankan Syariah.” Yuridika 31, no. 2 (2016).
