THE LIABILITY OF TAX OFFICIALS FOR THE EXPIRATION OF TAX DEBT BILLING
Universitas Narotama Surabaya
Universitas Narotama Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v2i1.276Tax receivables are part of the Directorate General of Taxes' revenue sources therefore tax receivables are part of the state's rights that must be realized as an integral part of state revenue. Unable to realize state revenue from tax receivables due to expiration of tax debt collection, the case is considered as a state financial loss. If the expiration of tax debt collection is caused by maladministration by tax officials, it will become the personal responsibility of tax officials. This research uses a normative type of research, which is a research that has been conducted with reference to the legal norms contained in the applicable laws and regulations. This research examines the liability of tax officials for the expiration of tax debt billing. The approach used in this research is a descriptive analysis, by describing the analysis of the regulation regarding the liability of tax officials for the expiration of tax debt billing. The process of collecting tax receivables is limited by the expiration of tax collection, which is 5 (five) years from the date of tax assessment or can be suspended if there are certain actions, one of which is the issuance of a coerce warrant. For tax receivables that have expired collection, Indonesian Audit Board has provided a recommendation in the form of an administrative warning to DJP, which means that Tax Officials have implemented all laws and regulations and procedures for collection actions that have been determined, so that the expiration of collection becomes a Official Liability.
Keywords: Liability Tax Officials The Expiration of Tax Debt
Imansyah, Shahrul Kresna. “Trading in Influence as a Crime in Indonesia Criminal Law System: A Juridical Study.” YURIS, Journal of Court and Justice 1, no. 2 (2022).
Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia, Sri Mulyani. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 189/PMK.03/2020 Tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Penagihan Pajak Atas Jumlah Pajak Yang Masih Harus Dibayar. Jakarta, 2020.
Muhamad, Asrulsani, and Trisacti Wahyuni. “Evaluation of Internal Control over Financial Reporting Designed on Tax Receivable Management: A Case Study on Tax Receivable Management Cycle at the Directorate General of Taxes.” Atlantis Press 55 (2017): 212–217. https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/25896812.pdf.
Philipus M Hadjon, et al. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2019.
Presiden, Soekarno. Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria Presiden Republik Indonesia. Jakarta, 1960.
Sakinah, Anzala. “Implementasi Kebijakan Sistem Pemungutan Pajak Self Assessment.” Jurnal Kebijakan Pemerintah 1, no. 1 (2018).
Samosir, Hotmian Helena. “Perlakuan Perpajakan Atas Utang Pajak Yang Telah Daluwarsa Sehubungan Dengan Restitusi Pajak.” Simposium Nasional Keuangan Negara (2018): 520–537.
Sihombing, Januardo S.P. “Penyelesaian Piutang Tak Tertagih Menurut Hukum Perpajakan.” BINUS Business Law (2016).
Soerjono Soekanto. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press), 2015.
Subagyo, Achmad, Saiful Abdullah, and Moh Saleh. “Legal Protection for Taxpayers Participants of Voluntary Disclosure Program in the Law on Harmonization of Tax Regulations.” IUS POSITUM (Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement) 1, no. 4 (2022). https://journal.jfpublisher.com/index.php/jlte/article/view/169.
Sufriadi. “Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Dan Tanggung Jawab Pribadi Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Yuridis 1, no. 1 (2014).
Yusrizal, and Refina Zulita. “Analysis of Income Tax Calculation Based on Fiscal Profit and Commercial Profit in PT. Siak Mining and Energy.” KURS 3, no. 1 (2018): 44–55.
