LEGAL STATUS OF ARMED CRIMINAL GROUPS IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v2i4.414The shooting case in Nduga Papua killed dozens of civilians. On December 1st and 2nd 2018, the civilians who working on Trans Papua bridge construction project become the victim to weapons by Free Papua Organization Armed Criminal Group (KKB-OPM). The purpose of this research is to answer the problems regarding armed conflict in Nduga Papua. The research method used in making this scientific journal is to use normative juridical methods that examines legal issues as well as provides a prescription regarding the examined case. This research will indicates the influence of power character with the shift based on Pancasila. Intially, Indonesia’s raison d’être was to liberate the colonized peoples from imperialism. Unfortunately, it reversed from that spirit that become into an imperialistic spirit in its implementation. By returning to its original spirit, Papua must be maintained as part of the sovereignty of Unitary State of Republic of Indonesia. The most prominent national security issues are terrorism, transnational security threats, and communal conflicts. Several preventive, repressive, and restorative legal solutions are necessary in order to confront the armed criminal groups and ensure their responsibility for the crimes committed.
Keywords: Armed Criminal Groups Legal Status Nduga Papua
Maharani, Mustika. “Analisis Masalah Pada Konflik Papua Merdeka Dalam Kaitan Dengan Kesenjangan Sosial Warga Indonesia.” Antropocene : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Humaniora 2, no. 1 (2022).
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Mufid, Ahmad Syafii. “Peta Gerakan Radikal Di Indonesia,” 2013.
Ngaisah, Siti, and Andi Setiawan. “Legal Protection for Grabfood Drivers Against Fictitious Orders as Default Actions: A Civil Law Perspective.” YURIS (Journal of Court and Justice) 1, no. 3 (2022): 52–63. https://journal.jfpublisher.com/index.php/jcj/article/view/149.
Nurhidayat, Kusuma, Arifuddin Uksan, and Pujo Widodo. “Menilik Politisasi Konflik Papua: Dilema Isu Keamanan Indonesia.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 7, no. 1 (2023): 234–46.
Putra, Milenio Januar, and Herma Setiasih. “The Role of Indonesian Police Intelligence in Preventing Mass Soccer Spectators’ Riot Based on The Regulation of The Head of Security Intelligence Agency of Indonesian National Police No. 2/2013.” IUS POSITUM: Journal of Law Theory and Enforcement 2, no. 3 (2023): 45–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v2i3.358.
Salmon, Indra Pratama Putra, Agung Budi Irawan, Asih Widi Lestari, Fierda Nurany, and Ihsan Rahmat. “Buruknya Layanan Dalam Kerangka Otonomi Khusus: Apakah Papua Masih Memiliki Kesempatan Untuk Berkembang?” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora 11, no. 3 (November 2022): 367–80. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v11i3.40754.
Simamora, Andrean Gregorius Pandapotan, and Georgius Ivan Budihardja. “Prinsip Penegakan Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia: Studi Kasus Penembakan Militer Terhadap Masyarakat Nduga Papua.” Jurist-Diction 4, no. 2 (2021): 499–518. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v4i2.25750.
Stake, Robert, and Merel Visse. “Case Study Research.” In International Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition), 85–91, 2023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.11010-3.
Suropati, Untung. “Solusi Komprehensif Menuju Papua Baru: Penyelesaian Konflik Papua Secara Damai, Adil Dan Bermartabat.” Jurnal Lemhannas Republik Indonesia 7, no. 1 (2019): 73–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v7i1.52.
