JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF APPEAL COURT DECISION NUMBER: 330/PDT/2023/PT BDG ON INDEMNIFICATION
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jmr.v3i3.650Globalization and the development of information technology, especially the internet, have changed many aspects of human life, which includes the way people connect with each other. Easy access to new information and social media usage, such as Facebook, create new legal challenges, especially when it comes to defamation. In Indonesia, the ITE Law regulates online behavior related to defamation, and Articles 1365 and 1372 of the Civil Code allow victims to claim damages, both physical and psychological, for losses suffered. This research aims to understand that defamation can be categorized as a violation of the law and punitive damages can be claimed. This normative juridical research uses primary legal materials, such as the Civil Code, Criminal Code, and Electronic Information Technology Law, as with secondary legal materials such as literature and journals. Articles 1365-1380 of the Civil Code regulate unlawful acts that can damage a person’s reputation. For instance, the case of Iin Yuhinda v. Septiano Broery Hidayat shows that defamation is a tort if it fulfills the elements in Article 1365 of the Civil Code. In addition, Articles 1243-1252 of the Civil Code also regulate compensation in violation of law cases. The results of this research indicated that a person who is damaged by defamation has the right to file a claim for compensation because it violates the law. Article 1365 of the Civil Code states that any act that harms another person must be compensated, while Articles 1372-1380 regulate the manner of claiming compensation for defamation.
Keywords: Compensation Defamation Law
Agung, K. M., & Yudisial, K. K. (2012). Peraturan Bersama Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia dan Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia Nomor 02/PB/MA/IX/2012 tentang Panduan Penegakan Kode etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim Ketua Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia dan Ketua Komisi Yudisial Republik Ind.
Albabana, N. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Bank atas Kelalaian Pegawainya terhadap Debitur yang Terkena BI Checking (Studi Putusan No. 15/Pdt.G/2015/Pn WNO). Jurnal Esensi Hukum, 2(1).
Artariana, A., Silviana, A., & Sudaryatmi, S. (2016). Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Tumpang Tindih Alat Bukti Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah antara PT Maligi Permata Industrial Estate dengan Perorangan (Studi Kasus di Desa Margakaya, Kabupaten Karawang). Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(3).
Badri, S., Handayani, P., & Anugrah Rizki, T. (2024). Ganti Rugi Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dan Wanprestasi Dalam Sistem Hukum Perdata. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 7(2), 974. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9440
Cevitra, M., & Djajaputra, G. (2023). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Onrechtmatige Daad) Menurut Pasal 1365 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dan Perkembangannya. UNES Law Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1
Gegen, G. (2021). Legal Aspects in The Process of Damages in Civil Courts. Legal Brief, 11(1).
Herlina, S. (2022). Sanksi Pidana Tentang Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Internet. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 3(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v3i2.76
Indonesia, P. P. (2024). Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Kramer, M. H. (2021). The Legal Positivism of H. L. A. Hart. In The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism (Vol. 80, Issue 2, pp. 301–324). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108636377.013
Lv, N. (2022). On the Relationship Between Rights and Obligations. Law and Economy, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.56397/LE.2022.09.03
Mantili, R. (2022). Ganti Kerugian Immateriil terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Praktik: Perbandingan Indonesia dan Belanda. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE’JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 4(2), 298–321. https://doi.org/10.35706/dejure.v4i2.6460
Muhajir, A., & Syafiq, M. A. (2023). Right and Obligation Husband Wife in Perspective Islam and State Law. Journal Analytica Islamica, 12(2), 250. https://doi.org/10.30829/jai.v12i2.17546
Popovych, T. P. (2024). The relationship of rights and obligations: questions of theory. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights, 1, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2024.1.12
Pratama, K. S., Pangkerego, O. A., & Lowing, N. S. (2021). Upaya Pemerintah dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Informasi Elektronik yang Mengganggu Ketertiban Umum. Lex Crimen, 10(4).
Schofield, P. (2021). Jeremy Bentham and the Origins of Legal Positivism. In The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism (pp. 203–224). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108636377.009
Subekti, R., & Tjitrosudibio, R. (1982). Kitab undang-undang hukum perdata = Burgerlijk wetboek (Cet. 15). Pradnya Paramita.
Suryoutomo, M., & Purwaningsih, S. (2020). Immaterial Compensation in Tort Law Acts Judge Made Law Through Rechsvinding. International Conference on Law, Economics and Health (ICLEH).
Wall, S. (2023). Mill’s Principle. In Enforcing Morality (pp. 23–43). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009363808.002
Yulistio, M. R., Puspitasari, S. A., Putrie, L. A., & Tarina, D. D. Y. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Kasus Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Berdasarkan Studi Kasus pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padang Nomor 161/Pdt.G/2021/PN Pdg. ResearchGate.
