Peer Review Process
UTSAHA is strictly follows the publication process of Open Journal System guidelines and templates that have been determined based on scientific articles guidelines. All submitted manuscript and will go through review process. After the review, the articles were read by editorial members and were corrected by Managing Editor to meet the required criteria by reviewers of UTSAHA Journal. The manuscript will be sent to two filters based on their experience in reviewing the manuscript or based on their field of specialization. It will be followed by review forms from reviewer. Moreover, the required Revision was made based on reviewers’ comments or suggestions. Reviewers provide the ratings on the context of article such as clarity, originality, and science / field contributions.
UTSAHA has four types of decisions:
- Accepted with No revision
- Accepted and revised on a minor scale (the author will revise the article before deadline)
- Accepted and revised on a major scale (the author will revise the article before deadline)
- Rejected (generally, in the background, outside the scope and objectives, the main problems of technical description, lack of clarity)
To check plagiarism, UTSAHA Editorial Board will screen plagiarism using Turnitin Plagiarism checker. If there is an indicator of plagiarism are found (25%-40%), the editorial board will let the author to revise the manuscript. And if the indicator of plagiarism above 50%, Editorial Board will immediately reject it