Publication Ethics

The publication ethics statement is the statement for all parties who involve in the process of publishing in JF Publisher as journal publisher, editorial board, reviewers, and author. Publishing in JF Publisher is free of conflict of interest, the authorship of the published article published in JF Publisher Journal is belongs to authors. The submitted article by authors should be original and free from plagiarism. there is no change on Editorial board publication decision. The three main ethics of duties consist of Editor duties, Author Duties and Reviewer Duties.

Author’s Duties

Original Research and Plagiarism Free

Authors of submit original research which present an accurate scope and significant objective discussion. The data should be presented accurately in research paper. The research should contain the detail and references to permit others to cite the research idea. inaccurate statements and unethical behavior could not be accepted. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that has been appropriately cited or quoted.

 

Multiple Publication

Author should not publish manuscripts which has the same content in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable.

 

Authorship of Manuscript

Authorship should be limited to those who have made significant contribution to the reported research. For everyone who have made significant contributions should be listed as authors and co-authors. The corresponding author should ensure that every appropriate co-author is included on the manuscript and all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of manuscript and have agreed to its submission for publication.

 

Fundamental Errors in Published Manuscript

When an author discovers significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published manuscript, it is the author’s obligation to notify journal editor or publisher and cooperate with editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Reviewer Duties

Objectivity Standard

Reviews should be conducted objectively and should formulated clear observation within the supporting arguments; therefore, authors can use it to improve the manuscript. It is not allowed to make personal criticism to author

Sources Acknowledgements

Any statement that include as an observation, derivation or argument that has been existed in previous publications should be accompanied by relevant citation. Reviewer should notify the editors regarding any substantial similarity inside the manuscript under consideration also any other personal knowledge (published and unpublished).

Conflicts of Interest

Any invited referee who has conflicts of interest should make declaration regarding their conflict of interest therefore alternative reviewers can be contacted.

Editor’s Duties

Editorial Decision Contribution

Reviewer support editors to make editorial decisions within the cooperation of authors, they assist authors to revise and improve their manuscripts. The editorial decision is a process which have an obligation to do a fair assessment on reviewing article.

Confidentiality

Every submitted manuscript are confidential documents and should be treated as confidential; the manuscript should not be shown to or discussed with others except it get authorized permission by Editor-in-Chief. It also applies for the internal and external reviewers.

Publication decisions

The editors ensure that all submitted manuscripts being considered for publication undergo peer-review by at least two reviewers who are expert in the field. The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for deciding which of the manuscripts submitted to the journal will be published, based on the validation of the work in question, its importance to researchers and readers, the reviewers’ comments, and such legal requirements as are currently in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The Editor-in-Chief may collaborate with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.