EMBRACING SMART ORTHODONTICS: 3D–BASED CUSTOM TEMPORARY ANCHORAGE DEVICES (TADS) FOR EFFICIENT MALOCCLUSION MANAGEMENTS
Universitas Airlangga
Introduction. Malocclusion, a common dental condition characterized by misalignment of teeth and jaws, has significant implications for masticatory function, periodontal health, and facial aesthetics. Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) have been widely utilized in orthodontics to enhance treatment stability and control complex tooth movements. However, variations in patient anatomy and the limitations of conventional TADs placement contribute to a 15–20% failure rate, underscoring the need for improved precision and customization. Objective this study reviews the potential of three–dimensional (3D) customized TADs as an innovative approach to achieve superior accuracy, stability, and efficiency in managing diverse malocclusion cases. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, Medline, ProQuest, and EBSCO databases. Twenty–three peer–reviewed articles published between 2019 and 2024 were analyzed, focusing on 3D–based TADs customization systems, their mechanical workflows, and their clinical efficacy in orthodontic treatment optimization. Result & Analysis. The 3D–based customization of TADs involves a digital workflow integrating CBCT and intraoral scanning, CAD design, finite element method (FEM) validation, and 3D printing through stereolithography (SLA), selective laser sintering (SLS), or direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). This technology enables highly individualized designs and guided insertion techniques, enhancing anchorage precision and reducing procedural errors. Evidence from systematic reviews indicates that 3D–guided TADs achieve higher accuracy and stability, with reduced failure rates compared to conventional methods. Furthermore, personalized TAD fabrication minimizes patient discomfort, enhances compliance, and shortens treatment duration. Discussion: The integration of 3D printing technology in TADs design marks a significant breakthrough in orthodontic practice. By providing precise, patient–specific devices and guided placement systems, 3D customized TADs improve clinical outcomes, minimize complications, and advance minimally invasive orthodontic care. Their adoption represents a vital step toward personalized and technologically advanced orthodontic treatment strategies.
Keywords: : malocclusion, temporary anchorage devices, 3D printing, orthodontic customization, guided insertion, digital orthodontics.
Ahlholm M, Vihma T, Laakso M. The impact of malocclusion on dental health-related quality of life: A systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41(1):89–95.
Baan F, Verkerke GJ, Huizenga H, van Houten F. Clinical validation of a 3D-printed guide for orthodontic mini-implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(4):1991–2000.
Cevidanes LHS, Ehsani N, Burch JG. The role of temporary anchorage devices in the treatment of complex malocclusions. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020;23(4):240–248.
Chun HJ, Park Y, Park SH. Fabrication of customized TADs using 3D printing techniques. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6(1):45–52.
Dong M, Li J, Li Y, Zhao Y. Advances in 3D printing technologies for orthodontics: A review. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(12):3546–55.
Duan Y, Zhao B, Zheng Y, Luo Q, Yin Y, Zhang D. Design, fabrication, and biomechanical analysis of personalized 3D-printed orthodontic mini-implants. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:824–33.
Jena AK, Mishra P, Singh P. 3D printing in orthodontics: A review. J Orthod. 2020;47(1):28–34.
Katsikogianni M, Giannousi Z, Papadopoulos M. Minimally invasive orthodontics using 3D-printed TADs: Enhancing patient comfort and results. Int J Orthod. 2020;58(3):125–33.
Kim H, Kim S, Chung KR, Baek SH. Accuracy of a novel CAD/CAM-based surgical guide for orthodontic mini-implants compared to traditional guides: A clinical trial. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):1220–8.
Kim JS, Cha JY, Lee KJ. Personalized 3D TAD placement for orthodontic treatments: Implications for accuracy and patient comfort. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(5):705–11.
Kırcali I, Yılmaz S, Duman S. Effects of malocclusion on dental health: A systematic review. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(2):441–51.
Lee K, Kim J, Kwon H. Complications and failure rates of temporary anchorage devices: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159(5):646–53.
Lim HJ, Chun YS, Kang SM. Comparison of direct and 3D-assisted TAD insertion in palatal implants: A clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157(3):376–83.
Liu Z, Zhang J, Jiang X. The effectiveness of TADs in orthodontic treatment: A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(2):253–60.
Nanda R, Upadhyay M. The use of miniscrews in orthodontics: Evidence from a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020;23(4):241–50.
Nielsen CC, Petersen DK, Johnson BD. Clinical outcomes of 3D-printed temporary anchorage devices: A systematic review. J Clin Orthod. 2021;55(2):89–96.
Park H, Lee S, Hwang C. Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: A review of the current literature. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;45(5):218–24.
Patel J, Benson PE. Less invasive orthodontic treatment with 3D customized TADs: A new era of patient care. Eur J Orthod. 2021;43(6):739–46.
Schneider J, Park J, Scherer M. Accuracy and success rates of orthodontic miniscrew insertion using 3D surgical guides: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthod. 2021;48(2):128–36.
Sinha P, Nair M, Soni V. Clinical applications of temporary anchorage devices: A review. J Clin Orthod. 2021;55(1):33–41.
Wang Y, Zhao X, Hu J. The relationship between malocclusion and periodontal disease: A clinical study. J Periodontal Res. 2020;55(2):232–8.
Zhang L, Deng C, Zhan X. Current trends and future perspectives in 3D-printed customized orthodontic implants. J Clin Med. 2021;10(5):97–104.
Zhao X, Sun L, Li Y. Finite element analysis for orthodontic anchorage devices: A systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020;23(3):132–40.
