Emerging Technology Adoption in Cambodian Military Higher Education: An Extended UTAUT-2 Study
Western University Cambodia
Western University Cambodia
Western University Cambodia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jssh.v5i4.1051Modernizing the education and training systems of the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces (RCAF) is essential for enhancing national defense capabilities and operational readiness amidst the evolving regional and international security landscape. This research analyzes the key factors influencing modernization efforts within the RCAF's education and training institutions. This study employs the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT-2) framework, which integrates elements from the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Diffusion of Innovations Theory (DIT), Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). To enhance the model's explanatory power, self-efficacy and anxiety factors were integrated into the UTAUT framework. A quantitative research method was employed to collect data from a total of 509 participants, including faculty, senior staff, and students—across two universities under the RCAF. The findings demonstrate that behavioral intention (BI) to adopt and use emerging technologies is significantly influenced by performance expectancy, self-efficacy, facilitating conditions, anxiety, and social influence. These factors collectively highlight the importance of both individual-level perceptions and contextual influences in shaping users’ willingness and readiness to adopt and integrate new technologies, whereas it is not influenced by effort expectancy (EE). Meanwhile, the actual use (AU) of modern technology for education and training is significantly influenced by behavioral intention. However, challenges such as resource constraints, resistance to organizational change, and insufficient efforts to build capacity are hindering progress. This study offers specific policy recommendations to defense leaders and emphasizes the importance of sustainable institutional reform. Furthermore, the need for additional research is emphasized to address existing gaps and support long-term changes in the field of military education and training in Cambodia.
Keywords: Innovative Education Management Military Education Technology Adoption
Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2026). Exploring success factors that impact artificial intelligence adoption on technological drivers and managerial capabilities. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 1–38.
Blasko, D. J. (2021). The PLA army after ‘below the neck’reforms: Contributing to China’s joint warfighting, deterrence and MOOTW posture. Journal of Strategic Studies, 44(2), 149–183.
Chan, F. K., Thong, J. Y., Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2025). Design characteristics and service experience with e-government services: A public value perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 80, 102834.
Changalima, I. A., & Chuwa, M. P. (2025). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in business research: A simple guide for novice researchers. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 14(9), 497–506.
Chen, X., & Slade, E. (2025). Theory of planned behaviour: A review.
Davis, A. P., Wiegers, T. C., Sciaky, D., Barkalow, F., Strong, M., Wyatt, B., Wiegers, J., McMorran, R., Abrar, S., & Mattingly, C. J. (2025). Comparative toxicogenomics database’s 20th anniversary: update 2025. Nucleic acids research, 53(D1), D1328–D1334.
Evans, M. I., & Britt, D. W. (2023). Resistance to change. Reproductive Sciences, 30(3), 835–853.
Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Becker, J.-M. (2025). Covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): a SmartPLS 4 software tutorial: JF Hair et al. In: Springer.
Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
In, C. (2025). The role of higher education institution leaders in building human capital in Cambodia: Challenges and strategies. Srawung: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 52–71.
Kamaruddin, S. N., Ismail, F. Z., Masrom, M. A. N., & Zulkifli, M. H. (2025). Minimising Risks of Wastage in Modular Construction. Built Environment Journal, 22(SI).
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
Lam, D. (2025). The next 2 billion: can the world support 10 billion people? Population and Development Review, 51(1), 63–102.
Lee, H.-P., Sarkar, A., Tankelevitch, L., Drosos, I., Rintel, S., Banks, R., & Wilson, N. (2025). The impact of generative AI on critical thinking: Self-reported reductions in cognitive effort and confidence effects from a survey of knowledge workers. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems,
Morales-Pastor, A., Miljuš, T., Dieguez-Eceolaza, M., Stępniewski, T. M., Ledesma-Martin, V., Heydenreich, F. M., Flock, T., Plouffe, B., Le Gouill, C., & Duchaine, J. (2025). Multiple intramolecular triggers converge to preferential G protein coupling in the CB2R. Nature Communications, 16(1), 5265.
Nagl, M. (2022). Statistical and machine learning for credit and market risk management
Ooi, K.-B., Tan, G. W.-H., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Capatina, A., Chakraborty, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Huang, T.-L., Kar, A. K., & Lee, V.-H. (2025). The potential of generative artificial intelligence across disciplines: Perspectives and future directions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 65(1), 76–107.
Pedroso, R., Zanetello, L., Guimarães, L., Pettenon, M., Gonçalves, V., Scherer, J., Kessler, F., & Pechansky, F. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the crack use relapse scale (CURS). Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo), 43(3), 37–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-60830000000081
Phan, P. (2025). Quality Enhancement Needs in Selected Private Higher Education Institutions at the Provinces in Cambodia. Srawung: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30–43.
Raghuvanshi, A. S., & Agarwal, A. (2025). An hourly dataset of moisture budget components over the indian subcontinent (1940–2024). Scientific Data, 12(1), 1770.
Rogers, J. G., Dorn, C., Aditya Raj, V., Schlichting, H. E., & Young, E. D. (2025). Most Super-Earths Have Less Than 3% Water. The Astrophysical Journal, 979(1), 79.
Saade, D., Jabagi, M.-J., Bertrand, M., Hider-Mlynarz, K., Grimaldi, L., & Zureik, M. (2025). Use of oral fluoroquinolones in France between 2014 and 2023: a nationwide drug utilization study. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance, 7(4), dlaf145.
Salih, L., Tarhini, A., & Acikgoz, F. (2025). AI-enabled service continuance: Roles of trust and privacy risk. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1–16.
Samnang, A., DAENGDEJ, J., & VONGURAI, R. (2021). Factors affecting acceptance and use of e-tax services among medium taxpayers in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB), 8(7), 79–90.
Schmidt, R., & Stumpe, B. (2025). Systematic review of mobile augmented reality applications in geography education. Review of Education, 13(1), e70042.
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of educational research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2007). The Italian versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory-II: Psychometric properties and discriminant power. Leading-edge psychological tests and testing research, 27–50.
Stark, J., Hössinger, R., & Ajzen, I. (2025). Explaining children’s physical activity: Experiential attitudes in the theory of planned behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 112, 63–76.
Taylor, C. R. (2025). What do motives for quiet luxury consumption tell us about intrinsic vs. extrinic motivation for consumer behavior in general? In (Vol. 44, pp. 617–619): Taylor & Francis.
Toraman Turk, S., Cox, K., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2025). Measuring the degree of mixed methods adoption: An investigation using doctoral dissertation abstracts. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 19(3), 304–324.
Tran, C. D., & Nguyen, T. T. (2021). Health vs. privacy? The risk-risk tradeoff in using COVID-19 contact-tracing apps. Technology in Society, 67, 101755.
Try, S., Daengdej, J., & Vongurai, R. (2022). Factors Affecting Intention to Use E-Learning Systems in Selected Universities in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. ABAC ODI Journal Vision. Action. Outcome, 10(1), 13–27.
Vannak, K., Hong, S., & Rady, C. (2025). FACTORS INFLUENCING USER SATISFACTION AND CONTINUANCE INTENTION IN MOBILE PAYMENT APPS IN CAMBODIA: A STRUCTURED LITERATURE REVIEW. Srawung: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 74–104.
Venkatesh, V. (2025). Paradigm changing metaverse: future research directions in design, technology adoption and use, and impacts. Decision Support Systems, 188, 114307.
Wiafe, I., Koranteng, F. N., Tettey, T., Kastriku, F. A., & Abdulai, J.-D. (2020). Factors that affect acceptance and use of information systems within the Maritime industry in developing countries: The case of Ghana. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 22(1), 21–45.
