LAW ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS OF ZTE WI-FI ROUTER THIEVERY
Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jssh.v2i1.267The crime of theft is regulated in Book II, Chapter XXII of Law Number 1 of 1946 concerning on the Criminal Code (KUHP) Articles 362 to Article 367. In this Chapter, five types of theft are regulated, such as Ordinary theft (Article 362) Criminal Code, Theft with weight (Article 363) of the Criminal Code, Minor theft (Article 364) of the Criminal Code, Theft with violence (Article 365) of the Criminal Code, and Theft in the family (Article 367) of the Criminal Code. The type of research used in this research is sociological or empirical legal research since, in this case, the researcher directly observes what is happening in society. Based on the research result, Surabaya District Court, which conducts criminal investigations and trials, has decided in the defendant's case, sentencing the Perpetrator of Theft of Zte Wi-FiRouter Based on Decision Number 2011/Pid.B/2022/PN Sby. According to panel of judges, the punishment imposed on the defendant as stated in the court decision has been deemed as appropriate and fair, both from the defendant's interests, society's interests, and the implementation of the law generally, that punishment is used as a last resort and not as an attempt to exact revenge for the perpetrator act.
Keywords: Crime Theft Zte Wifi Router
Arini, K. N., & Sujarwo, H. (2021). Kedudukan Saksi Ahli dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana. Syariati : Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hukum, 7(2), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.32699/syariati.v7i2.2244
Chazawi, A. (2021). Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).
Dermawan, D., Kalo, S., Ablisar, M., & Mulyadi, M. (2019). Pengujian Alat Bukti Dalam Penetapan Tersangka Di Praperadilan: Studi Kasus Putusan Praperadilan Di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan. USU LAW JOURNAL, 7(6), 118–130.
Hamzah, A. (2017). Hukum pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Ilyas, A. (2021). Praktik Penerapan Exclusionary Rules Di Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49–59.
Leeuw, F. L., & Schmeets, H. (2016). Empirical Legal Research A Guidance Book for Lawyers, Legislators and Regulators. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lengkong, L. Y. (2019). The Implementation of the Principle of Seeking Material Truth in Civil Procedure Law in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(3), 331–349.
Moeljatno. (2021a). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Moeljatno. (2021b). KUHP (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana). Bumi Aksara.
Muksin, M. R. S., & Rochaeti, N. (2020). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menggunakan Keterangan Ahli Kedokteran Forensik Sebagai Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i3.343-358
Nanda, D. H. (2021). Eksistensi Kedudukan Anak Sebagai Korban Dalam Perkara Perlindungan Anak (Studi Putusan Nomor 38/Pid. Sus/2019/PN Trg). In Verstek 9.
Palit, G. I. D. (2021). PENERAPAN KEYAKINAN HAKIM (CONVICTION IN RASIONEE) DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA. LEX CRIMEN, 10(5), 151–159.
Permana, E. S. (2021). Penjatuhan Putusan Hakim Atas Tindak Pidana Narkotika Berdasarkan Teori Conviction Rationee. Al-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial, 9(02), 471–482.
Saifudin, M., & Rosmaya, I. (2022). The Judicial Protection Against Copyright Holders from Music Piracy in Digital Era. SRAWUNG (Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities), 1(3), 77–82.
Siahaan, K. (2019). Kedudukan Hukum Akta Notaris Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Recital Review, 1(52), 72–88.
Werluka, L. (2019). Alat Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Pembuktian Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. Jurnal Belo, 4(2), 228–248.
