EXPLORATION OF POWER STRUGGLE IN CHATTERJEE’S PALLI SAMAJ
Tribhuwan University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jssh.v1i3.100The article aims to explore the issues of power relations and power struggle in Sarat Chandra Chatterjee’s novel, Palli Samaj from a Marxist perspective. The characters, Rama, Ramesh depicted in the novel represent the proletariat living in the Bengal region of India. Although these characters do not mention that they are driven by cultural hegemony, it is noticed that their psychology is embedded with cultural hegemony and class superiority. They are fighting for power. The study applies qualitative approach to research. The paper takes the ideology of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels as the research tool to analyze the power relations in the novel and thereby in the Indian society. It can be noticed that almost all the characters in the novel are fighting for power. Palli Samaj attempts to demonstrate how social power functions to create and continue social domination and how it further creates social prejudices, cultural hierarchy and hegemony. The chief finding is that Indian rural life is dominated by the cruel, corrupt upper-class Zamindari order, landlords to dominate the innocent lower- class peasants. The paper is expected to stand as a reference to all the scholars interested in researching Chatterjee further.
Keywords: Capitalist Hegemony Hierarchy Ideology Proletariat
Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (2019). The culture industry: Enlightenment as mass deception. In Philosophers on film from Bergson to Badiou (pp. 80–96). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/kul-17602-005
Bandopadhyay, A. K. (1986). History of modern Bengali literature: Nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Modern Book Agency.
Belsey, C. (2005). Textual analysis as a research method. In Research methods for English studies. Edinburgh University Press.
Chatterji, J. (2002). Bengal divided: Hindu communalism and partition, 1932-1947. Ravi Dayal and Permanent Black.
Cowling, K. (1982). Monopoly capitalism. Macmillan.
Das, S. K. (1995). History of Indian literature: 1911-1956, struggle for freedom. Creative.
George, K. M. (1997). Masterpieces of Indian literature. National Book Trust.
Kelly, K. (2020). What capitalism is and how it affects people. TeenVogue. https://www.teenvogue.com/story/what-capitalism-is
Levin, M. (1997). Review: From Marxism to Communism: A review article. Europe-Asia Studies, 49(8), 1519–1568. http://www.jstor.org/stable/154021
Lukács, G. (1971). History and class consciousness. Merlin.
Macherey, P. (1978). A theory of literary production. The MIT Press.
Marx, K. (1983). The communist manifesto. Penguin Books.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1994). The communist manifesto. International Publishers.
Mehrotra, A. K. (2003). A history of Indian literature in English. Columbia University Press.
Mittra, S. S. (2001). Bengal’s renaissance. Creative.
Palermo, G. (2019). Power: A Marxist view. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(5), 1353–1375. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey055
Rahaman, N. (2012). Marginalization and Indian English literature in the postcolonial context. Research Spectrum, 3(2).
Reddy, K. (1998). History of Indian literature. Atlantic.
Rockmore, T. (2018). Marx’s dream: From capitalism to communism. University of Chicago Press.
Sarker, S. C. (1977). Sarat Chandra Chatterjee: The great humanist. Indian Literature, 20(1), 49–77.
Sengupta, S. C. (1975). Saratchandra: Man and artist. Sahitya Akademi.
Sogani, R. (2002). The Hindu widow in Indian literature. Oxford University Press.
Szczepanski, K. (2020). Who are the Brahmins? ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/who-are-the-brahmins-195316
Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory today. Routledge.
