CRIMINAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OF URUK SOIL WITHOUT MINING BUSINESS LICENSE (IUP)
Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v2i1.262The government has the authority to control and guarantee the availability of natural resources for the benefit of society. Within its authority, the government has regulated and provided guidelines for the exploitation of natural resources in the mining sector in Indonesia through Law No. 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining (Minerba Constitution). This research aims to determine criminal liability and criminal law enforcement of the mining of uruk soil without a Mining Business License (IUP). The method used in this research is normative legal research. The results showed that several conditions must be filled for a person or legal entity to be sentenced, including the existence of a criminal act committed, the ability to be responsible and the element of error of intentionality or negligence. As stipulated in article 158 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal mining. Law enforcement by the police of the Directorate of Special Criminal Investigation of East Java Regional Police, through investigation, has succeeded in finding suspects on behalf of supono or supo. Based on witness statements, expert statements, suspect statements, and evidences, it have fulfilled the criminal elements of mining uruk and sand land without being equipped with a Mining Business License (IUP) as stipulated in article 158 of RI Law number 4/2009 concerning Mineral and Coal mining.
Keywords: Criminal Law Enforcement Mining of Uruk Soil Mining Business License (IUP)
Astamasmita, Romli, Didik Endro Purwoleksono, and Nur Basuki Minarno. Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Tinjauan Kritis Melalui Konsistensi Antara Asas, Teori Dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Astina, and Tarmizi. “Tindak Pidana Penambangan Pasir Tanpa Izin Produksi (Suatu Penelitian Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Sigli).” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana 4, no. 4 (2020): 784–794.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Purba, Chrisdon Zakaria, Hisar Siregar, and Lesson Sihotang. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Usaha Yang Melakukan Usaha Penambangan Tanpa Izin, IPR Atau IUPK (Studi Putusan Nomor 556/Pid.Sus/2019/PN BLS).” PATIK : Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (2021): 38–50.
Redi, Ahmad. “Dilema Penegakan Hukum Penambangan Mineral Dan Batubara Tanpa Izin Pada Pertambangan Skala Kecil.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 5, no. 3 (2016).
Rusianto, Agus. Tindak Pidana & Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Tinjauan Kritis Melalui Konsistensi Antara Asas, Teori, Dan Penerapannya. Cet. 1. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Salim. Hukum Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara. Cetakan Ke. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Sembiring, Shafira Nadya Rahmayani, Elis Rusmiati, and Imamulhadi. “Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pertambangan Batubara Tanpa Izin Di Kalimantan Timur Dikaitkan Dengan Tujuan Pemidanaan.” Jurnal Kertha Semaya 8, no. 4 (2020): 541–570.
Subagyo, Achmad, Moh Saleh, and Saiful Abdullah. “Legal Protection for Taxpayers Participants of Voluntary Disclosure Program in the Law on Harmonization of Tax Regulations.” IUS POSITUM (Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement) 1, no. 4 (2022).
Yola, Lorindhea Renata. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Usaha Penambangan Tanpa Izin Usaha Pertambangan Di Kepulauan Bangka Belitung Menurut UU No 4 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pertambangan Minetal Dan Batu Bara.” MAHUPAS : Mahasiswa Hukum Unpas 1, no. 1 (2021): 67–78.
