COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE DOCTRINE OF REPUDIATION OF CONTRACT IN THE CONTRACT FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS (CISG) AND THE TERMS OF CANCELLATION IN THE CIVIL CODE
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v3i4.649In International Civil Law, several types of breach can be found, one of which is anticipatory breach. The term anticipatory breach has its roots in the concept of repudiation, which covers a wider range of refusals. Repudiation includes not only anticipatory breach, but also every form of refusal to fulfill contractual obligations, both before and after the contract period begins. Anticipatory breach refers to actions that indicate one party's intention not to fulfill its contractual obligations to the other party. This research aims to analyze how the Contract for the International Sale of Goods or CISG and the Civil Code regulate the return of rights for breach committed by one of the parties. The method applied is normative juridical research with statute and comparative approach. The findings of this research indicated that validity of an agreement under Article 1320 of the Civil Code requires an agreement, capacity, a specific object, and a lawful cause. If these subjective and objective conditions are unmet, or if there is a breach causing harm, the agreement may be canceled, but only through a court decision as per Article 1266. Repudiation, the refusal to fulfill an agreement, has two models: the mirror image model and the differentiated model, which assess potential future losses. In international civil law, anticipatory breach, a concept linked to repudiation, is covered in Articles 71-73 of the CISG.
Keywords: Agreement Anticipatory Breach Breach of Contract CISG Civil Code
Aditya, Dimas, and Neneng Oktarina. “The Principle of Freedom of Contract in Procurement of Goods and Services Agreement between Commitment Making Officer and Provider (Study at the Office of Publics Work of Sijunjung Regency).” Unes Journal of Swara Justisia 3, no. 2 SE-Articles (September 3, 2019): 169–181. https://swarajustisia.unespadang.ac.id/index.php/UJSJ/article/view/105.
Akmal, Diya Ul, and Fauzziyyah Azhar Ramadhan. “Legal Ideals: Lawmaking and Law Enforcement Primarily Based on Community Social Life in Indonesia.” Precedente Revista Jurídica 23 (November 2023): 129–162.
Annisa, Feni, Aida Nur Fitriani, Mila Karmelia, Gema Refira Nugraha, and Budi Ardianto. “Hubungan Hukum Internasional Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Hukum Nasional.” Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora 1, no. 4 (June 2024): 188–198.
Butt, Simon A., and Tim Lindsey. “Liability for the Death of Aircraft Passengers in Indonesia.” Journal of Air Law and Commerce 85, no. 4 (2020): 573–731.
Carter, J W, Wayne Courtney, and Gregory Tolhurst. “Two Models for Discharge of a Contract by Repudiation.” The Cambridge Law Journal 77, no. 1 (November 7, 2018): 97–123. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26850925.
Hofmann, L. C., S. N. Van Opstall, H. Drion, and K. Wiersma. Het Nederlands Verbintenissenrecht: De Algemene Leer Der Verbintenissen, 1959.
Imran, Imran, Amran Suadi, Muh. Risnain, and Erlies Septiana Nurbani. “Aspects Of Justice Of Marriage Dispensation And Best Interests For Children.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 13, no. 1 (March 2024): 63.
Jamil, Nury Khoiril. “Implikasi Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Pada Keadaan Memaksa (Force Majeure) Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia.” Jurnal Kertha Semaya 8, no. 7 (2020): 1044–1054.
Kesuma, Arum Puspita, and Muh Afif Mahfud. “The Implementation of Pacta Sunt Servanda Principle as a Basis for Making Memorandum of Understanding.” Awang Long Law Review 5, no. 2 (May 31, 2023): 432–440. https://ejournal.stih-awanglong.ac.id/index.php/awl/article/view/724.
Mantili, Rai. “Ganti Kerugian Immateriil Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Praktik: Perbandingan Indonesia Dan Belanda.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE’JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum 4, no. 2 (March 2022): 298–321.
Oktavira, Bernadetha Aurelia. “Macam-Macam Perjanjian Dan Syarat Sahnya.” Hukumonline.Com.
Pakpahan, E. F., Atika Sunarto, and Dicky Alfredo Ginting. “Analysis of Consumer Protection Regulations Against Unlicensed Cosmetics by BPOM. Case Study: Etude House Cosmetic.” Legal Brief 11, no. 2 (2022): 1482–1491. https://legal.isha.or.id/index.php/legal/article/view/323.
Pitlo, A. Het Nederlands Burgerlijk Wetboek: Algemeen Deel van Het Verbintenissenrecht. Arnhem: Gouda Quint BV., 1979.
Purnama sari, Ayu. “Kedudukan Hukum Salinan Akta Notaris Dari Minuta Akta Yang Belum Lengkap Dalam Perspektif Prinsip Kehati-Hatian.” Recital Review 4, no. 2 (June 2022): 474–493.
Rusli, Tami. “Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Sebagai Dasar Perkembangan Perjanjian Di Indonesia.” Pranata Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 1 (2015): 24–36. https://jurnalpranata.ubl.ac.id/index.php/pranatahukum/article/view/152.
Sidabutar, Victor Tulus Pangapoi. “Kajian Pengaruh Kerjasama Perdagangan Indonesia – Chile Terhadap Peningkatan Perdagangan Indonesia Di Wilayah Asia Pasifik.” JURNAL BISNIS STRATEGI 26, no. 1 (January 2018): 39.
Sudiarawan, Kadek Agus, Putu Edgar Tanaya, and Bagus Hermanto. “Discover the Legal Concept in the Sociological Study.” Substantive Justice International Journal of Law 3, no. 1 (May 20, 2020): 94. http://substantivejustice.id/index.php/sucila/article/view/69.
Sudradjat, Mohamad Adya Laksmana, and Faisal Santiago. “Legal Certainty in Law Number 8 of 2016 Concerning Persons with Disabilities in Industrial Relations.” Journal of Social Research 2, no. 10 (September 4, 2023): 3349–3356. https://ijsr.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/ijsr/article/view/1401.
Utama, I Gede Angga Adi. “Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian Internasional.” Ganesha Civic Education Journal 1, no. 1 (2019): 37–48.
