SRAWUNG is strictly follows the publication process of Open Journal System guidelines and templates that have been determined based on scientific articles guidelines. All submitted manuscripts to SRAWUNG are processed in accordance with the Open Journal Systems (OJS) guidelines and the journal’s established author templates. Each manuscript undergoes an initial editorial screening to ensure compliance with the journal’s scope and formatting requirements. Subsequently, manuscripts are subjected to a double-blind peer review process by at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise in the field. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on criteria such as clarity, originality, and contribution to the field. Based on the reviewers’ comments and recommendations, authors are required to revise their manuscripts accordingly. The revised manuscripts are then reassessed by the editorial team, and, if necessary, returned to the reviewers for further evaluation. The final decision regarding acceptance or rejection is made by the editorial board, ensuring that all published articles meet the academic and ethical standards of SRAWUNG Journal.

SRAWUNG has four types of decisions:

1. Accepted with No revision
2. Accepted and revised on a minor scale (the author will revise the article before deadline)
3. Accepted and revised on a major scale (the author will revise the article before deadline)
4. Rejected (generally, in the background, outside the scope and objectives, the main problems of technical description, lack of clarity)

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

The Submitted manuscripts will be pre-reviewed by editors, to determine whether the manuscript fulfilled SRAWUNG requirements or not. Manuscripts which have fulfilled the journal guidelines will be peer-reviewed. Final decision of manuscript acceptance is solely decided by editors based on the reviewers' comment.

Peer review process can be briefly summarized into several steps below:

1. Manuscript Submission: The author submits the paper to the destined journal. It usually done via online system. journals may accept submissions by email in certain circumstances.
2. Editorial Office Assessment: Journal Editorial checks the paper composition and arrangement related to the Author Guidelines and make sure it includes the main requirements.
3. Invitation to Reviewers: Editor sends invitations to a person that would like to be appropriate reviewers. As received response, further invitations are issued.
4. Reviewer Responses: if the potential reviewers consider the article against their expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. Then, they can choose to accept or decline the manuscript. If possible, during their decline, Reviewer should suggest alternative reviewers.
5. Review Process: Reviewer read the paper several times. The first is used to obtain initial impression of manuscript. if there is a major problem the reviewer can directly reject the paper without further review. Then, reviewer could continue to submit the article to the journal, following by a recommendation to accept, revision required or immediately reject it.
6. Journal Evaluation Review: The editor evaluates all the returned manuscript before making an overall decision. the editor may invite an additional reviewer to get further opinion before making a decision.
7. The informed decision: The editor sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. Whether the comments are anonymous or not.
8. Further Step: If the manuscript is accepted, it will send to layout publication. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article.