Inclusivity Discourse in Indonesian Education Policy News: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Garuda School Program
Universitas Negeri Padang
Universitas Negeri Padang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/sujana.v4i3.1023This study examines how a single Kompas.com news article, "Sekolah Garuda Terbuka untuk Siswa Miskin, Inklusif, dan Tak Zonasi" (18 May 2025), constructs the discourse of inclusivity surrounding the Garuda School Program, an Indonesian government initiative introduced in 2025. Using Norman Fairclough's three-dimensional Critical Discourse Analysis model, comprising textual analysis, discursive practice, and sociocultural practice, this study analyzes lexical choice, modality, and transitivity patterns within the primary article, supplemented by related Kompas.com coverage for triangulation. Findings show that the text consistently positions the state as an active, benevolent agent and students as passive recipients, a transitivity pattern coded across eleven clauses describing the program's operation. The text relies almost exclusively on a single official source and frames the program against a discredited predecessor, producing a discursive closure that limits critical scrutiny. At the sociocultural level, the inclusivity narrative rests on a merit-based selection criterion that academic literature on meritocratic belief associates with the reproduction of structural inequality, since academic achievement correlates with unevenly distributed forms of educational and cultural capital. These findings indicate that the inclusivity narrative does not merely coexist with meritocratic selection but actively lends it public legitimacy, allowing a procedurally framed policy to be read as substantively fair. As the analysis rests on a single primary text supplemented by limited secondary sources, its findings describe this specific case rather than Indonesian educational policy journalism in general.
Keywords: Discursive Closure Educational Inclusivity Fairclough Garuda School Program Meritocracy
Al-Ghamdi, N. A. (2021). Ideological representation of fear and hope in online newspaper reports on COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. Heliyon, 7(4), e06864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06864
Batruch, A., Jetten, J., Van de Werfhorst, H., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2023). Belief in School Meritocracy and the Legitimization of Social and Income Inequality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(5), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221111017
Bourdieu, P. (2011). The Forms of Capital. In The Sociology of Economic Life (3rd Edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494338-6
Choi, H., & Varian, H. (2012). Predicting the Present with Google Trends. Economic Record, 88(s1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2012.00809.x
Fairclough, N. (1993). Discourse and Social Change. Polity.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse : Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge,.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J., & Wodak, R. (2011). Critical Discourse Analysis. In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (pp. 357–378). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446289068.n17
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith (eds.)). International Publishers.
Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (2026). Policing the Crisis. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350534674
Halliday, M. A. K., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
Herman, E. ., & Chomsky, N. (2010). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media by Edward S. Herman. Vintage Digital.
Jusni, E., Fonsén, E., & Ahtiainen, R. (2023). An Inclusive Early Childhood Education Setting according to Practitioners’ Experiences in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101043
Leotti, S. M., Sugrue, E. P., & Winges-Yanez, N. (Nick). (2022). Unpacking the worlds in our words: Critical discourse analysis and social work inquiry. Qualitative Social Work, 21(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325021990860
Lombard, M., & Xu, K. (2021). Social Responses to Media Technologies in the 21st Century: The Media are Social Actors Paradigm. Human-Machine Communication, 2, 29–55. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.2.2
Munfarida, E. (1970). ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH. KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v8i1.746
Phyak, P. (2021). Epistemicide, deficit language ideology, and (de)coloniality in language education policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2021(267–268), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-0104
Safitri, K., & Carina, J. (2025). Pemerintah Punya Program Sekolah Rakyat dan Sekolah Garuda, Apa Bedanya? Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/05/21/07480811/pemerintah-punya-program-sekolah-rakyat-dan-sekolah-garuda-apa-bedanya
Sari, Z. P., Sarofah, R., & Fadli, Y. (2022). The Implementation of Inclusive Education in Indonesia: Challenges and Achievements. Jurnal Public Policy, 8(4), 264. https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v8i4.5420
Sutrisna, T., & Akbar, N. A. (2025). Sekolah Garuda Terbuka untuk Siswa Miskin, Inklusif, dan Tak Zonasi. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/05/18/09380511/sekolah-garuda-terbuka-untuk-siswa-miskin-inklusif-dan-tak-zonasi
Tartory, R. (2020). Critical Discourse Analysis of Online Publications Ideology: A Case of Middle Eastern Online Publications. Sage Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020941471
Ulya, F. N., & Prabowo, D. (2025). Wamen Stella Sebut Sekolah Garuda Beda dengan RSBI: Makin Miskin, Makin Mungkin Diterima. Kompas. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/05/17/19442561/wamen-stella-sebut-sekolah-garuda-beda-dengan-rsbi-makin-miskin-makin
UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education.
Xiao, H., & Li, L. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of critical discourse analysis and its implications. Discourse & Society, 32(4), 482–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926521992150
Yasdin, Y., & Muksins, M. (2024). Political paradigms and vocational education policy in Indonesia: a document analysis. Quality Education for All, 1(1), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/QEA-10-2023-0007
