JURIDICAL ISSUES IN ENFORCING FINAL AND BINDING ARBITRAL AWARDS IN INDONESIA
Research Division, Indonesian Advocates Association (PERADI)
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v4i4.862Arbitration constitutes a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) conducted outside the judicial framework, specifically addressing disputes related to commerce and trade at both domestic and international levels. For arbitration to be applicable, there must be a contractual agreement to utilize an arbitration institution. Despite the widespread adoption of arbitration institutions for resolving business disputes, their efficacy, particularly in the enforcement of arbitral awards, remains a contentious issue. Arbitral awards may be executed voluntarily, provided there is full awareness and good faith. In instances where voluntary compliance is absent, an application may be submitted to the Chief Judge of the District Court to enforce compliance upon the respondent. The practical execution of these awards often encounters significant challenges, including prolonged durations and substantial costs, which can erode legal certainty.This study aims to examine the issues surrounding the enforcement of final and binding arbitral awards in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research which is descriptive in nature with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach which is then supported by empirical research to enrich the depth of the research process. The results of this research are the obstacles and legal efforts in overcoming the execution of final and binding arbitration awards.
Keywords: Arbitration Execution Verdict
Aburrasyid, Priyatna. Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska, 2002.
Batubara, Suleman, and Orinton Purba. Arbitrase Internasional. Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses, 2013.
Dodi, Gusri Putra. Arbitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Prenada Media, 2022.
Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johnny Ibhrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2016.
Entriani, Anik. “Arbitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia.” An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah 3, no. 2 (April 3, 2017). http://ejournal.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/index.php/nisbah/article/view/617.
Fitriyanti, Fadia, Ani Yunita, and Muhammad Khaeruddin Hamsin. “Peningkatan Kualitas Kompetensi Arbiter Syariah Di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (BASYARNAS).” Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 4, no. 3 (2020). https://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=1716534&title=PENINGKATAN+KUALITAS+KOMPETENSI+ARBITER+SYARIAH+DI+BADAN+ARBITRASE+SYARIAH+NASIONAL+BASYARNAS+WILAYAH+DIY&val=10000.
Fuady, Munir. Arbitrase Nasional Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis. Jakarta: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
Gautama, Sudargo. Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni Bandung, 1961.
Hanif, Rifqani Nur Fauziah. “Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.” Kementerian Keuangan Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara. Last modified 2020. Accessed September 11, 2023. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-manado/baca-artikel/13628/Arbitrase-Dan-Alternatif-Penyelesaian-Sengketa.html.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Arbitrase. Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini, 1991.
Iswanti, Anis, and Dr. Karim. “Policy Considerations in Providing Performance Allowances for the Process of Examining Disciplinary Violations for Structural Officials Within the Ministry of Law and Human Rights in View of Distributive Justice.” Journal of Court and Justice (August 23, 2024): 89–103. https://journal.jfpublisher.com/index.php/jcj/article/view/632.
Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1970 Nomor 74. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 1970 Tentang Pokok-Pokok Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Indonesia, 1970.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 Tentang Tata Cara Penunjukan Arbiter Oleh Pengadilan, Hak Ingkar, Pemeriksaan Permohonan Pelaksanaan, Dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase. Indonesia, 2023.
Mahkamah Agung RI. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Perkara Ekonomi Syariah. Indonesia, 2016.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Liberty, 2002.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Pengantar Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993.
Muskibah. “Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum 4, no. 2 (2021): 139–149. https://repository.unja.ac.id/id/eprint/17562%0A.
Natsir Asnawi, M. Hermeneutika Putusan Hakim: Pendekatan Multidisipliner Dalam Memahami Putusan Peradilan Perdata. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta UII Press, 2014.
Novanda, Ni Putu Rosita, Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati, and Ni Komang Arini Styawati. “The Legal Protection of Minority Shareholders against Company Consolidation in the Perspective of the Limited Liability Company Law.” Journal of Court and Justice (June 26, 2025): 1–19. https://journal.jfpublisher.com/index.php/jcj/article/view/762.
Nugroho, Susanti Adi. Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Dan Penerapan Hukumnya. 1st ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2015.
Pahlephi, Rully Desthian. “Pengertian Arbitrase Adalah: Prosedur, Jenis, Dan Contohnya.” Detikjabar. Last modified 2022. Accessed September 11, 2023. https://www.detik.com/jabar/berita/d-6231677/pengertian-arbitrase-adalah-prosedur-jenis-dan-contohnya.
Putri, Apriliani Indri Ningtyas, and Devi Siti Hamzah Marpaung. “Kedudukan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Di Indonesia Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999.” Jurnal Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora 9, no. 3 (2022). https://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/Justitia/article/view/4056.
Republik Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek), n.d. https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/kitab-undang-undang-hukum-perdata/detail?utm.
Sammartano, Mauro Rubino. International Arbitration Law. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1990.
Setiawan, S. H. Aneka Masalah Hukum Dan Hukum Acara Perdata. Bandung: Alumni, 1992.
Siregar, Dahris. “Insurance Companies’ Legal Obligations for Acts of Default Related to Consumer Protection.” Journal of Court and Justice (July 4, 2025): 1–16. https://journal.jfpublisher.com/index.php/jcj/article/view/743.
Soerodjo, Irwan. Kepastian Hukum Hak Atas Tanah Di Indonesia. Surabaya: Arkola, 2003.
Staatsdrukkerij. Het Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR). Indonesia, 1941.
———. Reglemen Acara Perdata (Reglement Op de Rechtsvordering / Rv), 1847.
———. Reglemen Acara Untuk Daerah Luar Jawa Dan Madura (Rechtsreglement Buitengewesten / RBg), 1927.
Subekti, R. Arbitrase Perdagangan. Bandung: Bina Cipta, 1979.
Sumampouw, M., and R. Subekti. “Pilihan Hukum Sebagai Titik Pertalian Dalam Hukum Perdjandjian Internasional.” Universitas Indonesia, 1968. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20449447&lokasi=lokal.
Sumartono, Gatot. Arbitrase Dan Mediasi Di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia, 2006.
Sutiarso, Cicut. Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Dalam Sengketa Bisnis. Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2011.
Umar, M. Husseyn, and A. Supriyani Kardono. Kertas Kerja Ekonomi, Hukum Dan Lembaga Arbitrase Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Komponen Hukum Ekonomi Proyek ELIPS, 1995.
Undang-undang Dasar 1945. Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, 2009.
Usman, R. Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti, 2013.
Winarta, Frans Hendra. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Dan Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Yani, Gunawan Widjaja Ahmad. Hukum Arbitrase. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2000.
YEO, Tiong Min. The Role of Public Policy, Overt and Camouflaged, in International Litigation and Arbitration. Singapore: National University of Singapore, 1997.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Indonesia, 1999.
