LEGAL ANALYSIS OF DIRECTORATE GENERAL CUSTOMS DECISIONS AT EAST JAVA REGIONAL OFFICE I The Objection of Customs Rate Assessment and Value of PT. Sinar Harapan Berkarya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v1i3.153The procedure for submitting an objection to the SPTNP (Letter Determination of Tariffs and/Customs Value) is regulated in the Regulation of Director General of Customs Per-15/BC/2017 concerning on Procedures for Filing and Settlement of Objections in the Customs and Excise Sector. The submission of objection to SPTNP PT. Sinar Harapan Berkarya, often get rejection from Director General of Customs. This study implements 2 problems of study, 1. How to grant the objection to tariffs and/or customs value (notul) at PT. Sinar Harapan Berkarya? 2. What is the reason on the objection of tariffs and/customs value (notul) of PT. Sinar Harapan Berkarya being rejected? This study aims to determine the obstacles of rejecting SPTNP objection and find out the conditions for SPTNP objection to be granted by Director General of Customs. This method uses empirical juridical research. This research examines legal provisions and what happens in field or in reality. The discussion includes the requirements for the fulfillment of SPTNP objection, the issuance of SPTNP, the calculation of Customs Tariffs and Values, the method of filing SPTNP objection, the factors that causes the rejection to the Tax Court and Analysis regarding the Decision of Customs General Director. Based on the analysis of objection, there is an inconsistency on the submitting method the Decree of the Director General of Customs.
Keywords: SPTNP Objection The Decision of Director General of Customs The Decision of Directorate General
Dea Ayu, Fevilia et.al. “Prosedur Penerapan Dokumen Bill Of Lading Dalam Aktivitas Ekspor-Impor.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2020): 22–26. https://www.ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/analogihukum/article/view/1612/1162.
Dewanty, Esty Hayu. “Rules of Origin Sebagai Instrumen Penanganan Praktik Illegal Transhipment.” Yuridika 27, no. 2 (2012): 157–171. https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/download/294/159.
Nugrahaeni, Rizka & Tjen, Christine. “Perception Analysis of The Harmonized System: A Case Study of Tariff Disputes in Indonesia.” Jurnal Perspektif Bea dan Cukai 5, no. 2 (2021): 144–164. https://jurnal.pknstan.ac.id/index.php/PBC/article/download/1249/719/6033.
Priyati, Prasetijo Rijadi dan Sri. Memahami Metode Penelitian Hukum Dalam Konteks Penulisan Skripsi / Tesis. Sidoarjp: Al-muktabah, 2017.
Sutedi, Adrian. Hukum Ekspor Impor. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya Grup, 2014.
Tasrif, Arifin et.al. “New Paradigm on Plant Quarantine System for Protection of Biological Diversity in Indonesia.” Jurnal Perlindungan Tanaman Indonesia 25, no. 1 (2021): 1–9. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jpti/article/download/62605/31775.
Zeiler, Kathryn. “The Future of Empirical Legal Scholarship: Where Might We Go From Here?” Journal of Legal Education 66, no. 1 (2016): 78–99.
